Biography: The ‘Harry Potter’ Kids (Pt 2)
9 Separate Photo 5x7" EMMA WATSON cute shoot in the nature #7
9 Separate Photo 5x7" EMMA WATSON cute shoot in the nature #7
9 Separate Photo 5x7" EMMA WATSON cute shoot in the nature #7
 | US $13.00 End Date: Saturday Feb-04-2012 13:41:25 PST Buy It Now for only: US $13.00 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| US $13.00 End Date: Saturday Feb-04-2012 13:41:25 PST Buy It Now for only: US $13.00 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| US $13.00 End Date: Saturday Feb-04-2012 13:41:25 PST Buy It Now for only: US $13.00 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Part 2 of 6 of a documentary featuring the history of the “Harry Potter” series actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson & Rupert Grint.
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:23 pm
thank the gods it wasnt animated or had an american voice >. > go jo!
February 1st, 2010 at 10:48 pm
3:44 umm yeah. . nice try. . . thats not ron
February 1st, 2010 at 11:32 pm
Oh man, I know, right?! o_0
February 2nd, 2010 at 12:16 am
stephen speilburg can fuk himself sayin it should hav been animated nd hav a wanker play him, its a british film nd should stay british im soo glad j. k. rowling sed that:D
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:09 am
6:15 “He could go through pubity and suddenly become very wierd looking” LOL
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:13 am
3:44
lmao
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:46 am
I think Rupert is the best acter of the three. Especialy in the first movie. He just seemed way more natural.
February 2nd, 2010 at 2:42 am
No it was meant to be Hermione. Her hair looks red becuase of the colour in the background. But it was Hermione that was flying with Harry.
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:21 am
no they deffo showed ginny.
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:27 am
I know everyone else already said it but it’s going to bug me if I don’t as well: That was Cedric you idiots! Not Ron! You couldn’t spend an extra min finding an actual pic of Ron before you made this documentary? *rolls eyes* Anyway, carry on. . .
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:40 am
at 3:44 that isn’t even ron! it’s cedric diggory. this is completely not true to the series.
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:56 am
You know better -. -
February 2nd, 2010 at 4:45 am
They were wrong about the ages. Dan was 10, Rupert 11 and Emma 9.
February 2nd, 2010 at 4:54 am
you mean on the cover of the book? on the hippogriff?
if you mean that, it’s really Hermione. She’s the one who rides the hippogriff with Harry in Prisoner of Azkaban.
February 2nd, 2010 at 5:18 am
Rupert was 12 when they started, Daniel Was 11,and Emma was 10. DR got the part when he was still 10 but turned 11 before filming began.
February 2nd, 2010 at 5:25 am
LOL that’s what he’s saying. That when you pick a cute kid they can turn out to be not so hot when they grow up. I can think of one or two of those chaps (and they shall remain nameless). But indeed, it turned out to be incredibly gorgeous, which is important when you want people to WANT actually pay to see his face on screen over and over and over again.
February 2nd, 2010 at 5:30 am
They showed Ginny for Hermione!
February 2nd, 2010 at 6:08 am
LOL the guy goes “. . . could have turned out weird looking. ” soooo wrong he was dr is HOT. nd i knw alot of ppl mentioned this but i think they showed a picture of cedric instead of ron coz none of da american covers has 1 of him and cedrics was da closest looking. no offence but y y’all americans hav to be dffrnt all da time?da british covers wer amazng and in new zealand(wher im frm) theyre the same. ne way jst glad they ddnt make into a retardd cartoon, whoo dat woudv been a complete flop!
February 2nd, 2010 at 6:57 am
haha imagine if it was a americian cartoon ha! tat would have been bad. . .
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:28 am
At 3:43, they show a pic of Cedric Diggory and call him Ron Weasley. . .
February 2nd, 2010 at 8:11 am
Umm. . . I believe that Rupert was 11 and Emma was 9, not 11 and 11. Jeez people, get your facts straight.
February 2nd, 2010 at 9:05 am
yeah i agree. that used to annoy me, but not as much anymore. it should should have jst been kept as it was
February 2nd, 2010 at 9:21 am
Yeah that was stupid. The whole cedric is ron thing.
February 2nd, 2010 at 9:34 am
yeah, what’s with that?
February 2nd, 2010 at 9:37 am
they change some of the british slang to american, but I know that there is some still there. I don’t think Harry Potter is “aimed” at certain people, its just a lovely story that has entertained many.